Romeo and Juliet Compare and Contrast Essay

Nowadays, it is almost impossible to revive gray-headed traditions from the past and appreciate them in our modern and exponential times. However, there let off are possibilities to cherish near of the archaic literature today that were pen so long ago. Celebrated as one of the greatest dramas of all time, Romeo and Juliet depicts a tragedy of two lovers who come from feuding families. The butterfly was world-class compose in the 1500s by William Shakespeare. Almost four-hundred years later, the tragic crook was make into a word-painting in 1968 by Franco Zeffirelli.There are similarities in shore and shots, and distinctions between the original play and the 1968 icon considering the moods and plot details. Either way, the play and the 1968 icon both train glorious presentations. As for the mood, there a few differences between the two versions of the tragedy. In the dialogue of marriage in the play, Romeo and Juliet are serious and sedate. In Zeffirellis version of t he play, the marriage scene makes Romeo and Juliet to look almost like fools of late love because they are constantly kissing and giggling.In a marriage, the bride and groom are to be calm and patient of because it is an important step in their lives, and the play shows this kind of character. The word-painting does non portray this realistic kind of character. During the funeral ceremony for Juliet, the Friar Lawrence make a giggle because he already knew about the secret plan. This part undone the sad and mischievous mood of the scene. Nevertheless, I believe the play and Zeffirellis movie did a great job in explaining the tragedy, but the movie could cod been a lot more enticing if it werent for those small(a) slip-ups.The play also could have used some help because it felt like the characters lacked some expression unlike the movie, but I cannot bump which one was better because the play is the way it is to be. One thing that the movie and the play collaborated to tolera teher, were the props and scenes. Full of venerable-fashioned dresses and rocky buildings, both payoffs have a very 1500s mood. Aside from the moods of the play, some of the plot details have been left out in both the movie production and the play. The play does a good job of explaining why Romeo was upset with Rosaline.The movie-viewers are complicated up to why Romeo is upset. Besides, if it werent for Rosaline, Romeo would never have met Juliet in the first place. I believe the wedding scene in the movie was a good choice, which wasnt shown in the play. The viewers would be confused at a point when watching the play because they would not know if Romeo and Juliet get married or not. Zeffirellis movie shows the marriage scene of Romeo and Juliet which made the plot clearer. One thing that seemed constant and realistic in the movie is the return of deaths in the tragedy.The play shows the tragedy of six deaths, while the movie shows only four deaths. One of the goals that most movie-makers have in enunciate to make a successful movie is to leave the audience on happy note and not depressed. Unlike from Shakespeare, who wanted to express dramatic, tragic, and young love, Zeffirelli did what was best for the audience and plot of the movie by decreasing the number of deaths in his production. Plus, I do appreciate the fact that the movie actually follows the play, unlike other movie productions of stories. The plot details in the scenes seemed charming constant overall.Unable to admire obsolete literature, we often tend to forget the old saying, old is gold. Romeo and Juliet is a tragic play written in the sixteenth century by William Shakespeare. The tragedy tells a legend about two young lovers who come from long-rivaling families. In 1968, Franco Zeffirelli made this play into a movie, after(prenominal) realizing the beauty of this tragedy. However, there are similarities and difference between the two production like mentioned earlier. Nevertheless, the original play and the 1968 movie tend to be some of the greatest classics to be told.