Chaucers Canterbury Tales - Concept of Charity in the General Prologue :: General Prologue Essays

The design of Charity in the General Prologue In the General Prologue, Chaucer presents an array of characters from the 1400s in order to paint portraits of human dish unitysty and stupidity as strong as virtue. Out of these twenty-nine character portraits three of them are particularly interesting because they deal with philanthropy. Charity during the 1400s, was a virtue of both(prenominal) religious and human traits. One character, the curate, exemplifies Chaucers idea of benignity, and two characters, Prioress, and Friar, to satirize the idea of charity and show that they are using charity for either devious reasons or out of convention or habit. According to the definition from the Websters dictionary, charity subject matter giving to the desirey and helping the poor. In Chaucers time, however, charity meant much more. It include a love of G-d and doing the will of G-d as well as the sympathetic of person one is. Thus Charity had two parts, one human, the different divine. Two parts that mixed in different portions depending on a person. Charity was a human virtue that the Church encouraged. People believed that if one does something good, he will be rewarded by G-d. Many people did meaningful, eleemosynary things out the goodness of their hearts, but others had done it for other reasons. Those reasons included making money from peoples suffering and giving to charity because someone told them to do so, kinda than from the goodness of their hearts or to ease the suffering of others. Chaucer plays off both of these parts of charity in his portraits to show how they can be feature differently in different people and to distinguish true charity from false charity. Parson exemplifies Chaucers idea of true charity. Even though Parson does not have any money, he considers himself rich spiritually. Going near the village, he teaches the poor and those who cant go to church about what G-d is and how to be a religious per son. He gives more than he receives. In fact, he avoids treatment to the rich and well-to-do because he prefers going to the humble and poor, who truly need his help and G-d. He doesnt run to London to earn easy kale