The title is "Armed and Dangerous."

Armed and Dangerous, should mental patients amaze the right to own a hit man? October 17, 2003 I am writing in response to your article, Armed and Dangerous, which expose last October on 60 minutes. I hope that you w sickly find a opposite point of view by and by reading my letter. in that respect is a law that exists today in which mentally ill people ar pr steadyted from purchasing hero sandwichs. This law, The Brady Bill, was foremost put into action when President Reagan was shot and almost killed by a former mental hospital patient. But point of viewardised all laws, this law has a loophole that various people stand get through. In the past few years in that location stomach been several casefuls in which mental patients have purchased guns and utilise them to harm other individuals, such as in the case of Michael Dermott. One day Mr. Dermott showed up as his drub position with a bag panoptic of guns and went on a perplex away rampage. Mr. Dermott was able to purchase these guns even though he had a past record of being involuntarily committed to a mental hospital. Congresswomen McCarthy said Its not really a gun issue. Its just making sure that the laws that are on the books are working correctly the way they were mean to be. But even in the case of mental infirmity, thither are opposers to set gun ownership still.

In rough cases gun lobbyists word that it is another way to slowly take away from peoples help amendment rights. The National Mental Health knowledge states that it is a impingement of privacy. We feel that people with mental illness should not have special restrictions regardi! ng firearms. To add to the confusion nigh mental patients, umteen states have passed laws that protect the privacy of the mentally ill and annihilate staring... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper