Should HPV Vaccination Be Mandatory Research Paper

Should HPV Vaccination Be Mandatory - Research Paper ExampleResearchers indicate that cervical cancer is more prevalent in women at a younger age. However, mandatory inoculation for cervical cancer can cause a series of consequences. This paper will discuss why young girls should non be given mandatory vaccination for preventing cervical cancer. The HPV vaccination was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration tardily in 2006 and therefore its long term effects are alleviate unknown to the world. Ashton reveals that the effects of HPV vaccination can lead to fatal motor accidents and suicides. fit in to the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, a number of adverse side effects including pancreatitis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, and spinal cord inflammation have been reported since the thanksgiving of the vaccine. Although these adverse reactions may be rare, they are not worth the risk since the vaccine only protects against two of the 15 strains of HPV that may cause c ancer of the uterine cervix (Should any vaccines be required for children?.). There are also about doubts about the effectiveness of this vaccine because it was tested only on 1,100 girls and this number is light to get a clear picture of the vaccines functionability. Researchers have identified that around 15 types of genital HPV out of 30 are apparent to lead to cervical cancer. However, the Gardasil provides coverage against only two of the 15 and therefore it cannot be considered as an effective vaccine to HPV. Hence, this vaccine provides coverage against only some limited viral strains. Evidently, the US governing has not done adequate researches to explore the long term impacts of such a mandate. Since its long term implications still remain to be unknown, the mandatory vaccination is more likely to lead to additional health issues. In other words, the US government risks the public take place through the mandatory HPV vaccination. Obviously, the HPV vaccination must no t be mandated before its long term side effects are clearly identified. Ethically, parents have the net right to make health decisions for their children and therefore the government should not intervene in those decisions. According to a survey conducted by the University of Michigan, 31% of parents do not support mandatory school entry vaccinations (Should any vaccines be required for children?.). They hold the view that they must have the authority to refuse such vaccinations. legion(predicate) of the US parents hold the view that the process of vaccination is religiously wrong. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees citizens to freely exercise their religious belief. Hence, the forcible vaccination would subvert the first Amendment. Similarly, this mandatory vaccination policy gives exception to boys and hence it can be considered as the direct violation of constitutional principles of equity. Forcible enforcement of mandatory HPV vaccination would r esult in public backlash and this situation may adversely affect childhood vaccine programs for other diseases. Many people strongly surround in favor of the proposal by pointing to other mandatory vaccinations against measles and smallpox. They ask why it is necessary to give exception to mandatory HPV vaccination season practicing mandatory vaccination against several other diseases. Here, it must be noted that the HPV is not airborne and sexual contact is the major cause of cervical cancer. The government has a potential motive to protect its people from a deadly airborne virus because